[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] idr_get_new_exact ?
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- To: device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>, Roland Dreier <rdreier cisco com>, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad wizery com>, akpm linux-foundation org, Steve Wise <swise chelsio com>, linux-ppp vger kernel org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-raid vger kernel org, linux-rdma vger kernel org, Paul Mackerras <paulus samba org>, linux-i2c vger kernel org, "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux fluff org>, netdev vger kernel org, "Jean Delvare (PC drivers, core)" <khali linux-fr org>, Sean Hefty <sean hefty intel com>, Roland Dreier <rolandd cisco com>, Hal Rosenstock <hal rosenstock gmail com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] idr_get_new_exact ?
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:38:25 +0100
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:26:47PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I agree. Wouldn't those users better off simply using radix tree?
Can't speak for the other users, but dm uses it both ways - normally
happy with any id (minor number), but sometimes user requires a specific
one.
Alasdair
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]