[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging
- From: "hch infradead org" <hch infradead org>
- To: NeilBrown <neilb suse de>
- Cc: linux-raid vger kernel org, Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe fusionio com>, "linux-kernel vger kernel org" <linux-kernel vger kernel org>, "hch infradead org" <hch infradead org>, dm-devel redhat com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:59:30 -0400
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:14:28AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> My understanding of that was that the calling requirement of
> __elv_add_request is that the queue spinlock is held and that interrupts are
> disabled.
> So rather than possible enabling and disabling interrupts several times as
> different queue are handled, the code just disabled interrupts once, and
> then just take the spinlock once for each different queue.
>
> The whole point of the change to plugging was to take locks less often.
> Disabling interrupts less often is presumably an analogous goal.
>
> Though I agree that a comment would help.
>
> q = NULL;
> + /* Disable interrupts just once rather than using spin_lock_irq/sin_unlock_irq
> * variants
> */
> local_irq_save(flags);
>
>
> assuming my analysis is correct.
Your explanation does make sense to be now that you explain it. I
didn't even thing of that variant before.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]