[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] [PATCH 2/4] Fix a race between reading a new block and having it recycled.
- From: Joe Thornber <ejt redhat com>
- To: mpatocka redhat com
- Cc: dm-devel redhat com, Joe Thornber <ejt redhat com>
- Subject: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/4] Fix a race between reading a new block and having it recycled.
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 15:36:46 +0100
---
drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-block-manager.c | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-block-manager.c b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-block-manager.c
index c9fb132..b68be88 100644
--- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-block-manager.c
+++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-block-manager.c
@@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ static int recycle_block(struct dm_block_manager *bm, dm_block_t where,
* Wait for a block to appear on the empty or clean lists.
*/
spin_lock_irqsave(&bm->lock, flags);
+retry:
while (1) {
/*
* Once we can lock and do io concurrently then we should
@@ -486,7 +487,11 @@ static int recycle_block(struct dm_block_manager *bm, dm_block_t where,
spin_lock_irqsave(&bm->lock, flags);
__wait_io(b, &flags);
- /* FIXME: Can b have been recycled between io completion and here? */
+ /*
+ * Has b been recycled whilst we were unlocked?
+ */
+ if (b->where != where)
+ goto retry;
/*
* Did the io succeed?
--
1.7.4.1
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]