[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] convert dm-thin to use dm-bufio
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>
- To: device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>
- Cc: Joe Thornber <thornber redhat com>, "Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] convert dm-thin to use dm-bufio
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:11:46 -0400
On Fri, Aug 19 2011 at 9:31am -0400,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka redhat com> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2011, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 18 2011 at 6:31pm -0400,
> > Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka redhat com> wrote:
> >
> > > > This all sounds good; get the locking interface in and I'll switch to
> > > > bufio straight away.
> > > >
> > > > - Joe
> > >
> > > I uploaded bufio-based block manager at
> > > http://people.redhat.com/mpatocka/patches/kernel/dm-thinp-bufio/. It
> > > supports locks, but it defines new functions down_write_non_owner and
> > > up_write_non_owner.
> >
> > dm-bufio.patch:
> > drivers/md/Kconfig needs a more comprehensive description for DM_BUFIO's
> > help.
>
> There is intentionally no description. If there is no description, this
> option won't appear in "make menuconfig" menu.
>
> dm-bufio is selected automatically when some module that needs it is
> configured. There is no need to select dm-bufio manually.
Hmm, I wonder if it makes sense to remove DM_PERSISTENT_DATA's help
description?
(we already select DM_PERSISTENT_DATA when DM_THIN_PROVISIONING is
selected -- but it is visible in menuconfig because it has a
description).
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]