[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] linux-next - WARNING: at fs/block_dev.c:824 bd_link_disk_holder+0x92/0x1ac()
- From: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
- To: Karel Zak <kzak redhat com>
- Cc: Valdis Kletnieks vt edu, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-raid vger kernel org, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>, Alexander Viro <viro zeniv linux org uk>, Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura ce jp nec com>, Milan Broz <mbroz redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] linux-next - WARNING: at fs/block_dev.c:824 bd_link_disk_holder+0x92/0x1ac()
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:52:10 +0100
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 02:37:22PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > It seems that dependencies (holders/slaves) between devices is pretty
> > generic thing. Why do you think that we need claimer-specific method?
> > The /sys filesystem is better that ictls in many ways.
Also, one more thing. In btrfs, there's no block device for the
master device. You can add the slaves directory somewhere and your
choice would be as good as any other's but it just will not be generic
while being superflous exactly the same way it's superflous for md and
dm devices.
Thanks.
--
tejun
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]