[dm-devel] newbie question regarding target_type's map callback
Krzysztof Błaszkowski
kb at sysmikro.com.pl
Sun Jun 19 12:33:17 UTC 2011
On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 02:48 +0100, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> All I can suggest is studying the existing upstream targets to
> understand better how they work and perhaps avoid problems like the ones
> you are seeing.
How about DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE ?
>
> What is your target trying to do?
it is just a simple model target now which passes back requests from
inbox queue to dm_io() on a single backend dev in context of target's
work queue.
> (Why is split_io important?
well, for same reason like dm-stripe. i may need this in the future for
switching backend devices dynamically according to bio LBA. This is why
i want to have a bio of size not bigger than split_io.
> Did you implement a merge fn?)
no, i didn't. i don't know a purpose of merge fn.
I can see that e.g. dm-stripe doesn't use this callback in 2.6.33 kernel
while dm-stripe from 2.6.39 uses it.
furthermore dm-linear from 2.6.33 and .39 utilize .merge but split_io is
0.
>
> Alasdair
>
--
Krzysztof Blaszkowski
More information about the dm-devel
mailing list