[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF
- From: James Bottomley <James Bottomley HansenPartnership com>
- To: Hannes Reinecke <hare suse de>
- Cc: linux-scsi vger kernel org, lsf lists linux-foundation org, dm-devel redhat com, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, rwheeler redhat com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:26:52 -0500
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 16:10 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 04:02 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 07:58 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >> No, seriously. I think it would be good to have a separate slot
> >> discussing DCB (be it FCoE or iSCSI) and cgroups.
> >> And how to best align these things.
> >
> > OK, I'll go for that ... Data Centre Bridging; experiences, technologies
> > and needs ... something like that. What about virtualisation and open
> > vSwitch?
> >
> Hmm. Not qualified enough to talk about the latter; I was more
> envisioning the storage-related aspects here (multiqueue mapping,
> QoS classes etc). With virtualisation and open vSwitch we're more in
> the network side of things; doubt open vSwitch can do DCB.
> And even if it could, virtio certainly can't :-)
Technically, the topic DCB is about Data Centre Ethernet enhancements
and converged networks ... that's why it's naturally allied to virtual
switching.
I was thinking we might put up a panel of vendors to get us all an
education on the topic ...
James
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]