[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] do not disable ext4 discards on first discard failure? [was: Re: dm snapshot: ignore discards issued to the snapshot-origin target]
- From: Karel Zak <kzak redhat com>
- To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin petersen oracle com>
- Cc: sandeen redhat com, Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>, device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>, DarkNovaNick gmail com, linux-lvm redhat com, Lukas Czerner <lczerner redhat com>, linux-ext4 vger kernel org, Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] do not disable ext4 discards on first discard failure? [was: Re: dm snapshot: ignore discards issued to the snapshot-origin target]
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 10:33:44 +0200
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:16:05AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Lukas" == Lukas Czerner <lczerner redhat com> writes:
>
> I got tired of poking around in sysfs to find the discard topology.
> Here's a patch against lsblk that adds a -D option to present this
> information in a human-readable form:
Applied, thanks.
> # lsblk -D
> NAME DISC-ALN DISC-GRAN DISC-MAX DISC-ZERO
> sda 0 0B 0B 0
> └─sda1 0 0B 0B 0
> sdb 0 512B 2G 1
> └─sdb1 0 512B 2G 1
I have a question, 2.6.35 on my ThinkPad, non-SSD disk:
NAME DISC-ALN DISC-GRAN DISC-MAX DISC-ZERO
sda 0 0B 0B 0
├─sda1 4294935040 0B 0B 0
├─sda2 4188038656 0B 0B 0
├─sda3 1346205184 0B 0B 0
├─sda4 3231165440 0B 0B 0
├─sda5 4188006400 0B 0B 0
│ └─kzak-home (dm-0) 0 0B 0B 0
└─sda6 2035725312 0B 0B 0
Does is make sense? The DISC-ALN is non-zero but DISC-GRAN is zero.
Note that cat /sys/block/sda/sda*/discard_alignment returns the same
numbers.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak redhat com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]