[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/3] block: Move non-rotational flag to queue limits
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin petersen oracle com>
- To: Jens Axboe <jaxboe fusionio com>
- Cc: "msb chromium org" <msb chromium org>, "dm-devel redhat com" <dm-devel redhat com>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin petersen oracle com>, "linux-kernel vger kernel org" <linux-kernel vger kernel org>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/3] block: Move non-rotational flag to queue limits
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:28:01 -0400
>>>>> "Jens" == Jens Axboe <jaxboe fusionio com> writes:
Jens> On 2011-05-31 04:19, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>> - queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT, disk->queue);
>> + blk_queue_non_rotational(queue);
Jens> I don't like this part of the change. Before it was immediately
Jens> apparently that we were setting this flag, know you have no idea
Jens> what it does. Please make that blk_queue_set_non_rotational().
I was just trying to mimic the rest of the topology calls.
How about:
blk_queue_rotational(q, BLK_QUEUE_ROTATIONAL|BLK_QUEUE_NON_ROTATIONAL)
Doing it that way would make the code clearer a few places too, I
think...
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]