[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] Bisected: Massive memory leak in dm-snapshot in 3.1 development introduced
- From: Michael Leun <ml newton leun net>
- To: Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka redhat com>, dm-devel redhat com, Linus Torvalds <torvalds linux-foundation org>, LKML <linux-kernel vger kernel org>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Bisected: Massive memory leak in dm-snapshot in 3.1 development introduced
- Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:30:42 +0200
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 14:44:49 +0100
Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:52:06PM +0300, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Mikulas, Alasdair? I see the mempool_free() for the "master job",
> > what about everything else? Does the dm_kcopyd_prepare_callback()
> > perhaps need to do a
> >
> > job->master_job = job;
> >
> > or similar?
>
> If you look at the other place that performs that mempool_alloc, it's
> indeed present there.
>
> Michael - can you test if this solves the problem?
>
> Alasdair
>
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c
> @@ -628,6 +628,7 @@ void *dm_kcopyd_prepare_callback(struct
> dm_kcopyd_client *kc, job->kc = kc;
> job->fn = fn;
> job->context = context;
> + job->master_job = job;
>
> atomic_inc(&kc->nr_jobs);
>
>
Yup, it indeed does.
--
MfG,
Michael Leun
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]