[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] dm-block-manager: use spinlocks that don't disable interrupts
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>
- To: device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>
- Cc: Edward Thornber <thornber redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] dm-block-manager: use spinlocks that don't disable interrupts
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:57:42 -0400
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:24:48AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> dm-block-manager: use spinlocks that don't disable interrupts
>
> This will never be called in an interrupt context, so we don't have to use
> spinlocks that disable interrupts.
The code looks like a re-implementation of rw_semaphores to me.
Is there any good reason to do this? (hint: normally there isn't :))
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]