[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v5 09/12] block: Rework bio_pair_split()
- From: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
- To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet google com>
- Cc: axboe kernel dk, dm-devel redhat com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-bcache vger kernel org, mpatocka redhat com, vgoyal redhat com, yehuda hq newdream net, sage newdream net, agk redhat com, drbd-dev lists linbit com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v5 09/12] block: Rework bio_pair_split()
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 16:09:44 -0700
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:08:38PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> This changes bio_pair_split() to use the new bio_split() underneath,
> which gets rid of the single page bio limitation. The various callers
> are fixed up for the slightly different struct bio_pair, and to remove
> the unnecessary checks.
>
> v5: Move extern declaration to proper patch, per Boaz
I don't get this. Why can't bio_split() chain the split to the
original one thus make bio_pair unnecessary? It's not like completing
the split bio with the same end_io ever makes sense.
Thanks.
--
tejun
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]