[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 00/16] generic hashtable implementation
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields fieldses org>
- To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928 gmail com>
- Cc: snitzer redhat com, fweisbec gmail com, Trond Myklebust netapp com, paul gortmaker windriver com, dm-devel redhat com, agk redhat com, aarcange redhat com, rds-devel oss oracle com, eric dumazet gmail com, venkat x venkatsubra oracle com, ccaulfie redhat com, mingo elte hu, dev openvswitch org, jesse nicira com, josh joshtriplett org, rostedt goodmis org, lw cn fujitsu com, mathieu desnoyers efficios com, axboe kernel dk, linux-nfs vger kernel org, edumazet google com, linux-mm kvack org, netdev vger kernel org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, ejt redhat com, ebiederm xmission com, tj kernel org, teigland redhat com, akpm linux-foundation org, torvalds linux-foundation org, davem davemloft net
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 00/16] generic hashtable implementation
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:16:14 -0400
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 06:24:34PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> SUNRPC/cache: use new hashtable implementation
..
> lockd: use new hashtable implementation
FWIW, these look fine (and I ran them through some nfs tests and didn't
see any problems).
--b.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]