[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v6 04/13] pktcdvd: Switch to bio_kmalloc()
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina suse cz>
- To: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
- Cc: Peter Osterlund <petero2 telia com>, Kent Overstreet <koverstreet google com>, dm-devel redhat com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-bcache vger kernel org, mpatocka redhat com, bharrosh panasas com, vgoyal redhat com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v6 04/13] pktcdvd: Switch to bio_kmalloc()
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (cc'ing Jiri, hi!)
Hi there! :)
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:04:01AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > This is prep work for killing bi_destructor - previously, pktcdvd had
> > its own pkt_bio_alloc which was basically duplication bio_kmalloc(),
> > necessitating its own bi_destructor implementation.
> >
> > v5: Un-reorder some functions, to make the patch easier to review
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet google com>
> > CC: Peter Osterlund <petero2 telia com>
>
> Apart from bio_reset() not resetting bi_end_io and bi_private, this
> looks fine to me but lack of testing makes me a bit hesitant to ack
> it.
>
> Peter doesn't want to be the maintainer of pktcdvd anymore. Maybe
> Jiri can be tricked into taking this one too? :)
Gah, seems like the floppy saga is going to cause me some more trouble in
the future ... :)
Well, I definitely have hardware back at home that supports this, so I can
take it. Doesn't seem to be heavy traffic code either.
Peter, ok with that? Also, how was this usually fed upstream -- through
Jens' tree?
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]