[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] backing-dev: use synchronize_rcu_expedited instead of synchronize_rcu
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck linux vnet ibm com>
- To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz infradead org>
- Cc: axboe kernel dk, dm-devel redhat com, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka redhat com>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, "Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] backing-dev: use synchronize_rcu_expedited instead of synchronize_rcu
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:29:02 -0800
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:59:04PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 15:43 -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > Do you have some measurable use case where the user is removing block
> > devices so heavily that this causes a problem?
>
> Even one can be a problem, we're having people spend lots of time and
> effort to reduce machine wide jitter and interference. Adding it with
> such disregard isn't cool.
>
> There's no reason a management cpu adding or removing block devices
> should perturb the high-freq trading or industrial laser control running
> on the other side of the machine.
Very true for real-time applications!
For the heavy trading apps, given Frederic's upcoming user-mode-idle work,
I can keep this stuff from perturbing the apps. Still, batching would
be preferable.
Thanx, Paul
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]