[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [RESEND PATCH 1/3] scsi_dh: add scsi_dh_attached_handler_name
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>
- To: James Bottomley <jbottomley parallels com>, James Bottomley hansenpartnership com
- Cc: dm-devel redhat com, "Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk redhat com>, linux-scsi vger kernel org
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RESEND PATCH 1/3] scsi_dh: add scsi_dh_attached_handler_name
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:07:33 -0400
On Tue, Jun 26 2012 at 2:32pm -0400,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com> wrote:
> Introduce scsi_dh_attached_handler_name() to retrieve the name of the
> scsi_dh that is attached to the scsi_device associated with the provided
> request queue. Returns NULL if a scsi_dh is not attached.
>
> Also, fix scsi_dh_{attach,detach} function header comments to document
> @q rather than @sdev.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>
> Tested-by: Babu Moger <babu moger netapp com>
> Reviewed-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan us ibm com>
> Acked-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare suse de>
Hi James,
Any insight on staging this scsi_dh patch for 3.6?
Or what about adding your Acked-by and allowing Alasdair to submit it
for 3.6 with the corresponding dm-mpath patch?
However you'd like to skin it is fine by me. I'd just _really_
appreciate some feedback.
Thanks,
Mike
p.s. I'm nothing if not persistent ;)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]