[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] [RFC PATCH] block: all callers should check blkdev_issue_flush's return
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>
- To: axboe kernel dk, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org
- Cc: tj kernel org, hch infradead org, jmoyer redhat com, dm-devel redhat com, vgoyal redhat com
- Subject: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH] block: all callers should check blkdev_issue_flush's return
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:27:25 -0400
It is concerning that a FLUSH may fail but the blkdev_issue_flush
callers assume it will always succeed.
Each blkdev_issue_flush caller should come to terms with the reality
that a FLUSH may fail -- the file_operations' .fsync methods in
particular. nilfs2 is the only filesystem that checks
blkdev_issue_flush's return.
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>
---
include/linux/blkdev.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index ba43f40..76d6e48 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ static inline struct request *blk_map_queue_find_tag(struct blk_queue_tag *bqt,
#define BLKDEV_DISCARD_SECURE 0x01 /* secure discard */
-extern int blkdev_issue_flush(struct block_device *, gfp_t, sector_t *);
+extern int __must_check blkdev_issue_flush(struct block_device *, gfp_t, sector_t *);
extern int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned long flags);
extern int blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
--
1.7.1
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]