[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [Bcache v13 04/16] Fix ratelimit macro to compile in c99 mode
- From: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
- To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet google com>
- Cc: linux-bcache vger kernel org, agk redhat com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [Bcache v13 04/16] Fix ratelimit macro to compile in c99 mode
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:43:00 -0700
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:09:00PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet google com>
> ---
> include/linux/ratelimit.h | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ratelimit.h b/include/linux/ratelimit.h
> index e11ccb4..9ad57d3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ratelimit.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ratelimit.h
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ struct ratelimit_state {
> #define DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(name, interval_init, burst_init) \
> \
> struct ratelimit_state name = { \
> - .lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.lock), \
> + .lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_INITIALIZER(name.lock),\
NACK, kernel is not built in c99 mode and using anonymous struct in
struct initializers is an accepted convention.
Thanks.
--
tejun
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]