[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] bcache performance test problem
- From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet google com>
- To: Qinling <mail qinling huawei com>
- Cc: "dm-devel redhat com" <dm-devel redhat com>, Lizefan <lizefan huawei com>, "linux-bcache vger kernel org" <linux-bcache vger kernel org>, Keliang <kernel ke huawei com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] bcache performance test problem
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 21:34:02 -0400
That is pretty terrible performance. If you could try digging around a
bit with perf, blktrace, etc. that'd be much appreciated - otherwise
I'll see if I can come up with some way of reproducing it as soon as I
have time. I haven't done a lot of performance testing on upstream
kernels, unfortunately.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Qinling <mail qinling huawei com> wrote:
> Hi Kent,
>
>
>
> I have tested bcache on my platform, but the result is not good. I think
> maybe the wrong config caused it. Would you pls help me to check the config,
> or give me some advice for bcache performance testing?
>
>
>
> My SSD card is a PCIe SSD card (about 120,000 IOPS), and I used 10GB.
>
>
>
> I have download the code from
> git://evilpiepirate.org/~kent/linux-bcache.git.
>
> The commands creating bcache is below:
>
> make-bcache –B /dev/sdb8
>
> make-bcache –C –w4k –b1M –writeback /dev/hioa5
>
>
>
> I use FIO to test the seq./random IO performance, and the result is below:
>
> write read randwrite randread
>
> bcache 10809 KB/s 164502.5 KB/s 2713 KB/s 29640 KB/s
>
> cache_hit_rate 80 79 94
> 92
>
>
>
>
>
> And the basic test result is:
>
> Write read randwrite randread
>
> HDD 81211.6 KB/s 172242 KB/s 2606 KB/s 1855 KB/s
>
> SSD 250948.2 KB/s 813855 KB/s 238892.7 KB/s 657319.5 KB/s
>
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]