[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 04/14] block: Add bio_clone_kmalloc()
- From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal redhat com>
- To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet google com>
- Cc: axboe kernel dk, yehuda hq newdream net, dm-devel redhat com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, tj kernel org, linux-bcache vger kernel org, mpatocka redhat com, bharrosh panasas com, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, sage newdream net, agk redhat com, drbd-dev lists linbit com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 04/14] block: Add bio_clone_kmalloc()
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:59:19 -0400
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 05:02:41PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
[..]
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index 013c7a5..5a953c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static struct bio *bio_chain_clone(struct bio **old, struct bio **next,
> }
>
> while (old_chain && (total < len)) {
> - tmp = bio_kmalloc(gfpmask, old_chain->bi_max_vecs);
> + tmp = bio_clone_kmalloc(old_chain, gfpmask);
> if (!tmp)
> goto err_out;
>
> @@ -751,13 +751,9 @@ static struct bio *bio_chain_clone(struct bio **old, struct bio **next,
> if (!bp)
> goto err_out;
>
> - __bio_clone(tmp, &bp->bio1);
> -
> *next = &bp->bio2;
Is this code correct. Now original code might clone bio after split and
new code will clone the original bio itself and not the split one?
Thanks
Vivek
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]