[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 08/14] block: Kill bi_destructor
- From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh panasas com>
- To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal redhat com>
- Cc: axboe kernel dk, dm-devel redhat com, Kent Overstreet <koverstreet google com>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, tj kernel org, linux-bcache vger kernel org, mpatocka redhat com, yehuda hq newdream net, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, sage newdream net, agk redhat com, drbd-dev lists linbit com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 08/14] block: Kill bi_destructor
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:43:03 +0300
On 05/24/2012 10:52 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> In fact I am not even sure that for one driver we should introduce
> bio_reset() in generic block layer. So to me we should get rid of bio_reset()
> and let all the gory details remain in driver.
>
I disagree. The kind of trick we do where up to BIO_RESET_BYTES
the struct is memset **must** stay at header, very close to the
structure.
I would though make bio_reset() inline at header, it's a single
memset. Even the memset is inlined by the compiler.
> Thanks
> Vivek
Thanks
Boaz
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]