[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v3 05/16] block: Kill bi_destructor
- From: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
- To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet google com>
- Cc: axboe kernel dk, yehuda hq newdream net, dm-devel redhat com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-bcache vger kernel org, mpatocka redhat com, vgoyal redhat com, bharrosh panasas com, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, sage newdream net, agk redhat com, drbd-dev lists linbit com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v3 05/16] block: Kill bi_destructor
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 10:36:08 +0900
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 01:25:28PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Now that we've got generic code for freeing bios allocated from bio
> pools, this isn't needed anymore.
>
> This also changes the semantics of bio_free() a bit - it now also frees
> bios allocated by bio_kmalloc(). It's also no longer exported, as
> without bi_destructor there should be no need for it to be called
> anywhere else.
I like this patch but I'd *really* like to see the patch description
giving some background and explains *why* this is a good change.
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> index 6b7daf3..b6ddbf1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> @@ -74,11 +74,8 @@ struct bio {
> struct bio_integrity_payload *bi_integrity; /* data integrity */
> #endif
>
> - /* If bi_pool is non NULL, bi_destructor is not called */
> struct bio_set *bi_pool;
Maybe explain that %NULL bi_pool indicates kmalloc backed allocation?
--
tejun
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]