[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable

From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928 gmail com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds linux-foundation org>
Cc: snitzer redhat com, fweisbec gmail com, Trond Myklebust netapp com, bfields fieldses org, paul gortmaker windriver com, dm-devel redhat com, agk redhat com, aarcange redhat com, rds-devel oss oracle com, eric dumazet gmail com, venkat x venkatsubra oracle com, ccaulfie redhat com, mingo elte hu, dev openvswitch org, jesse nicira com, josh joshtriplett org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt goodmis org>, lw cn fujitsu com, mathieu desnoyers efficios com, axboe kernel dk, linux-nfs vger kernel org, edumazet google com, linux-mm kvack org, netdev vger kernel org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, ejt redhat com, ebiederm xmission com, Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>, teigland redhat com, akpm linux-foundation org, davem davemloft net
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 00:23:48 -0400

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds linux-foundation org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928 gmail com> wrote:
>>
>> I can either rebase that on top of mainline, or we can ask maintainers
>> to take it to their own trees if you take only 01/16 into mainline.
>> What would you prefer?
>
> I don't really care deeply. The only reason to merge it now would be
> to avoid any pain with it during the next merge window. Just taking
> 01/16 might be the sanest way to do that, then the rest can trickle in
> independently at their own leisure.

Okay, I'll keep working on converting everything else as soon as 01/16
makes it in your tree.


Thanks,
Sasha

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]