[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 4/5] aio: vmap ringbuffer
- From: Zach Brown <zab redhat com>
- To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet google com>
- Cc: linux-bcache vger kernel org, tytso mit edu, linux-kernel vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 4/5] aio: vmap ringbuffer
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:58:36 -0700
> Not if we decouple the ringbuffer size from max_requests.
Hmm, interesting.
> This would be useful to do anyways because right now, allocating a kiocb
> has to take a global refcount and check head and tail in the ringbuffer
> just so it can avoid overflowing the ringbuffer.
I'm not sure what you mean by a 'global refcount'.. do you mean the
per-mm ctx_lock?
> If we change aio_complete() so that if the ringbuffer is full then the
> kiocb just goes on a linked list - we can size the ringbuffer so this
> doesn't happen normally and avoid the global synchronization in the fast
> path.
How would completion events make their way from the list to the ring if
an app is only checking the ring for completions from userspace?
- z
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]