[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v7 08/16] block, elevator: use new hashtable implementation
- From: Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>
- To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928 gmail com>
- Cc: snitzer redhat com, fweisbec gmail com, Trond Myklebust netapp com, bfields fieldses org, paul gortmaker windriver com, dm-devel redhat com, agk redhat com, aarcange redhat com, rds-devel oss oracle com, eric dumazet gmail com, venkat x venkatsubra oracle com, ccaulfie redhat com, mingo elte hu, dev openvswitch org, jesse nicira com, josh joshtriplett org, rostedt goodmis org, mathieu desnoyers efficios com, axboe kernel dk, linux-nfs vger kernel org, edumazet google com, linux-mm kvack org, netdev vger kernel org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, ejt redhat com, ebiederm xmission com, lw cn fujitsu com, teigland redhat com, akpm linux-foundation org, torvalds linux-foundation org, davem davemloft net
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v7 08/16] block, elevator: use new hashtable implementation
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:29:27 -0700
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 03:02:20PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Switch elevator to use the new hashtable implementation. This reduces the amount of
> generic unrelated code in the elevator.
>
> This also removes the dymanic allocation of the hash table. The size of the table is
> constant so there's no point in paying the price of an extra dereference when accessing
> it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928 gmail com>
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj kernel orG>
But please reformat commit message to fit inside 80col (preferably 74
or something like that).
Thanks.
--
tejun
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]