[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds linux-foundation org>
- To: Al Viro <viro zeniv linux org uk>
- Cc: snitzer redhat com, fweisbec gmail com, Trond Myklebust netapp com, bfields fieldses org, paul gortmaker windriver com, dm-devel redhat com, agk redhat com, aarcange redhat com, rds-devel oss oracle com, eric dumazet gmail com, venkat x venkatsubra oracle com, ccaulfie redhat com, mingo elte hu, dev openvswitch org, jesse nicira com, josh joshtriplett org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt goodmis org>, lw cn fujitsu com, mathieu desnoyers efficios com, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928 gmail com>, axboe kernel dk, linux-nfs vger kernel org, edumazet google com, linux-mm kvack org, netdev vger kernel org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, ejt redhat com, ebiederm xmission com, Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>, teigland redhat com, akpm linux-foundation org, davem davemloft net
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:48:19 -0700
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Al Viro <viro zeniv linux org uk> wrote:
>
> BTW, how serious have you been back at KS when you were talking about
> pull requests killing a thousand of lines of code being acceptable
> at any point in the cycle?
Well... I'm absolutely a lot more open to pull requests that kill code
than not, but I have to admit to being a bit more worried about stuff
like your execve/fork patches that touch very low-level code.
So I think I'll punt that for 3.8 anyway.
Linus
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]