[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds linux-foundation org>
- To: Al Viro <viro zeniv linux org uk>
- Cc: snitzer redhat com, fweisbec gmail com, Trond Myklebust netapp com, bfields fieldses org, paul gortmaker windriver com, dm-devel redhat com, agk redhat com, aarcange redhat com, rds-devel oss oracle com, eric dumazet gmail com, venkat x venkatsubra oracle com, ccaulfie redhat com, mingo elte hu, dev openvswitch org, jesse nicira com, josh joshtriplett org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt goodmis org>, lw cn fujitsu com, mathieu desnoyers efficios com, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928 gmail com>, axboe kernel dk, linux-nfs vger kernel org, edumazet google com, linux-mm kvack org, netdev vger kernel org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, ejt redhat com, ebiederm xmission com, Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>, teigland redhat com, akpm linux-foundation org, davem davemloft net
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:48:51 -0700
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Al Viro <viro zeniv linux org uk> wrote:
>
> Oh, well... there go my blackmail plans ;-) Seriously, though, I'm at loss
> regarding several embedded architectures - arch/score, in particular,
> seems to be completely orphaned.
Don't worry about it. Do a best-effort, and if nobody ever reacts
about some odd-ball architecture, whatever.
We won't start deleting architectures over something like this, but it
might be another sign down the road that some arch code can be removed
entirely.
So it's not arch/score I'd worry about. It's all the *other* architectures..
Linus
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]