[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v3 01/17] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
- From: Pedro Alves <palves redhat com>
- To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt goodmis org>
- Cc: snitzer redhat com, fweisbec gmail com, Trond Myklebust netapp com, bfields fieldses org, paul gortmaker windriver com, dm-devel redhat com, agk redhat com, aarcange redhat com, rds-devel oss oracle com, eric dumazet gmail com, venkat x venkatsubra oracle com, ccaulfie redhat com, mingo elte hu, dev openvswitch org, jesse nicira com, josh joshtriplett org, lw cn fujitsu com, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu desnoyers efficios com>, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928 gmail com>, axboe kernel dk, linux-nfs vger kernel org, edumazet google com, linux-mm kvack org, netdev vger kernel org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, ejt redhat com, ebiederm xmission com, Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>, teigland redhat com, akpm linux-foundation org, torvalds linux-foundation org, davem davemloft net
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v3 01/17] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
- Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:51:04 +0100
On 09/04/2012 09:59 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 18:21 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 09/04/2012 06:17 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 17:40 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>>
>>>> BTW, you can also go a step further and remove the need to close with double }},
>>>> with something like:
>>>>
>>>> #define do_for_each_ftrace_rec(pg, rec) \
>>>> for (pg = ftrace_pages_start, rec = &pg->records[pg->index]; \
>>>> pg && rec == &pg->records[pg->index]; \
>>>> pg = pg->next) \
>>>> for (rec = pg->records; rec < &pg->records[pg->index]; rec++)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, but why bother? It's hidden in a macro, and the extra '{ }' shows
>>> that this is something "special".
>>
>> The point of both changes is that there's nothing special in the end
>> at all. It all just works...
>>
>
> It would still fail on a 'break'. The 'while' macro tells us that it is
> special, because in the end, it wont work.
Please explain why it would fail on a 'break'.
--
Pedro Alves
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]