[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v8 3/8] dm: Use bioset's front_pad for dm_rq_clone_bio_info
- From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet google com>
- To: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura ce jp nec com>
- Cc: linux-bcache vger kernel org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>, Alasdair Kergon <agk redhat com>, tj kernel org, vgoyal redhat com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v8 3/8] dm: Use bioset's front_pad for dm_rq_clone_bio_info
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:28:49 -0700
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:21:15PM +0900, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
> On 09/06/12 05:27, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > @@ -2718,7 +2705,8 @@ struct dm_md_mempools *dm_alloc_md_mempools(unsigned type, unsigned integrity)
> > if (!pools->tio_pool)
> > goto free_io_pool_and_out;
> >
> > - pools->bs = bioset_create(pool_size, 0);
> > + pools->bs = bioset_create(pool_size,
> > + offsetof(struct dm_rq_clone_bio_info, clone));
> > if (!pools->bs)
> > goto free_tio_pool_and_out;
>
> frontpad is not necessary if type is DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED.
>
> Other pool creation in that function do something like:
> pools->bs = (type == DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED) ?
> bioset_create(pool_size, 0) :
> bioset_create(pool_size, offsetof(struct dm_rq_clone_bio_info, clone));
>
Eh, it doesn't really matter considering it's two pointers of padding
and struct bio + the inline vecs are something like 200 bytes, but I can
do it if it makes you happy. Can I get someone's acked-by?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]