[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v10 0/8] Block cleanups
- From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet google com>
- To: Jens Axboe <axboe kernel dk>
- Cc: dm-devel redhat com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-bcache vger kernel org, Tejun Heo <tj kernel org>, Alasdair Kergon <agk redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v10 0/8] Block cleanups
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:44:18 -0700
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 07:37:10PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2012-09-06 17:48, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello, guys.
> >
> > (cc'ing Jens, Alasdair and Neil)
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:34:54PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> >> Screwed up the bio_reset() patch in the last patch series when I went to edit
> >> the description, fixed that here.
> >>
> >> Only other change is the dm patch - made the front_pad conditional on
> >> DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED.
> >>
> >> Kent Overstreet (8):
> >> block: Generalized bio pool freeing
> >> block: Ues bi_pool for bio_integrity_alloc()
> >> dm: Use bioset's front_pad for dm_rq_clone_bio_info
> >> block: Add bio_reset()
> >> pktcdvd: Switch to bio_kmalloc()
> >> block: Kill bi_destructor
> >> block: Consolidate bio_alloc_bioset(), bio_kmalloc()
> >> block: Add bio_clone_bioset(), bio_clone_kmalloc()
> >
> > This series looks good to me now. If someone can ack the dm patch, I
> > think it's good to go. Jens, what do you think?
>
> Looks OK to me too. I'll run a quick perf test on this tomorrow, and get
> it queued up for 3.7 if it looks fine.
Thanks!
> Kent, are to resend 3+5 to me?
You should have it now.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]