[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Fix a crash when block device is read and block size is changed at the same time
- From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer redhat com>
- To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka redhat com>
- Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe kernel dk>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange redhat com>, Jan Kara <jack suse cz>, Eric Dumazet <eric dumazet gmail com>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, Alexander Viro <viro zeniv linux org uk>, kosaki motohiro jp fujitsu com, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, lwoodman redhat com, "Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Fix a crash when block device is read and block size is changed at the same time
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:22:40 -0400
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka redhat com> writes:
> Hi Jeff
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
> It would be interesting ... what happens if you take the patch 3, leave
> "struct percpu_rw_semaphore bd_block_size_semaphore" in "struct
> block_device", but remove any use of the semaphore from fs/block_dev.c? -
> will the performance be like unpatched kernel or like patch 3? It could be
> that the change in the alignment affects performance on your CPU too, just
> differently than on my CPU.
I'll give it a try and report back.
> What is the CPU model that you used for testing?
http://ark.intel.com/products/53570/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E7-2860-%2824M-Cache-2_26-GHz-6_40-GTs-Intel-QPI%29
Cheers,
Jeff
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]