[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: strange network problems
- From: "Avery Pierce" <apierce camteq net>
- To: enigma-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: strange network problems
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:38:55 -0500
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:29:95:60:60
> inet addr:X.X.X.X Bcast:255.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>This looks like where your problem is, why does it have a /24 mask
>but an all-ones broadcast address? It should be X.X.X.255 (where
>the X's refer to the inet address).
>
>If that public interface is configured via dhcp (eg, cable), then
>there could be a problem with your ISP's configuration (which would
>be unforgivable :-)
eth1 is configured for dhcp. I know if I call them they will just tell me they dont support linux.
Heres some more info if it helps. Thanks for your time.
here is a "ip -s a"
eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:e0:29:1d:98:6e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.200.1/24 brd 192.168.200.255 scope global eth0
eth1: <BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:e0:29:95:60:60 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet x.x.x.x/24 brd 255.255.255.255 scope global eth1
Here is a "ip route"
24.53.194.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src x.x.x.x
192.168.200.0/24 via 192.168.200.1 dev eth0 scope link
192.168.200.0/24 dev eth0 scope link
127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
default via 24.53.194.1 dev eth1
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 10/30/2002 at 3:30 PM Tony Nugent wrote:
>On Tue Oct 29 2002 at 23:16, "Avery Pierce" wrote:
>
>> Im using a PII 350 with 2 SMC 1211TX Nics (realtek 8139). Its
>> used for a firewall / NAT Gateway with 1 pc behind it. If im
>> uploading a file on the firewall my pc behind the firewall had no
>> internet access on tiemouts. I get heavy packet loss when I ping
>> an outside server..like google.com. When uploading from my pc
>> through the firewall everything works just fine. Downloading also
>> works fine . Im logging all dropped packets with iptables and
>> nothing is behind dropped. There isnt any errors in
>> /var/log/messages pertaining to the network interfaces. ive tried
>> updating anything that might be causing this.
>
>(please wrap your text to make it readable, like I've just done).
>
>> System:
>> Redhat 7.2 Enigma
>> Kernel 2.4.18-17.x
>> Nic Driver 8139too
>> iptables 1.2.5-3
>>
>> I connect to the internet with a SurfBoard sb4100 cablemodem through
>Adelphia.
>> My pc connects to the firewall using a crossover cable. My pc has an
>smc 1211tx nic also.
>> Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Heres an ifconfig on the firewall
>
>/sbin/ifconfig is becoming obselete. Use "/sbin/ip -s link" (and/or
>"ip -s a") to get a better output.
>
>
>> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:29:1D:98:6E
>> inet addr:192.168.200.1 Bcast:192.168.200.255
>Mask:255.255.255.0
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:35202 errors:6 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>
>(I'd check what is causing these errors if they persist).
>
>> TX packets:24688 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
>> RX bytes:2402686 (2.2 Mb) TX bytes:2912915 (2.7 Mb)
>> Interrupt:5 Base address:0xc000
>>
>> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:29:95:60:60
>> inet addr:X.X.X.X Bcast:255.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>
>This looks like where your problem is, why does it have a /24 mask
>but an all-ones broadcast address? It should be X.X.X.255 (where
>the X's refer to the inet address).
>
>What have you got in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 ?
>That interface doesn't seem to be configured right.
>
>If that public interface is configured via dhcp (eg, cable), then
>there could be a problem with your ISP's configuration (which would
>be unforgivable :-)
>
>> UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:26893 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:35608 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
>> RX bytes:3045857 (2.9 Mb) TX bytes:2968880 (2.8 Mb)
>> Interrupt:10 Base address:0xe000
>
>Yeah, the itself card is working fine.
>
>The problem could be elsewhere (in your routing table, which you can
>see with "/sbin/ip route") or in your actual firewall rules (which
>you haven't shown here, but not likely to be the cause if some
>packets are getting through).
>
>But the bad 255.255.255.255 broadcast address needs to be fixed (if
>that is what it really showing up as).
>
>> Avery Pierce
>> Camteq Professional Systems
>> www.camteq.com
>
>Cheers
>Tony
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>enigma-list mailing list
>enigma-list redhat com
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enigma-list
Avery Pierce
Camteq Professional Systems
www.camteq.com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]