On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:25:29PM -0600, Bernard Johnson wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:47:35PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > >>> No, don't put the blame on me (or the FPC or the future), it's your > >>> vote. > >>> > >> You started it and you have to support it if you want people to vote. > >> > > > > No, I didn't start it, it was brought up here by (another) 3rd party > > repo manager. I just recorded the need for voting on it and did my > > part of voting. > > > > I don't think thl is being unreasonable here. *Someone* has to support > it. If you consider it to be a big enough issue to warrant a vote, then > you should support it. > > There is not nearly enough bandwidth in the group to go out and "look" > for issues. If a 3rd party repo manager has a strong opinion on > repotag, then he should be here supporting his views. That already happened a month ago and generated lots of discussion on this list: 22% of this list's traffic ever is about that! And just for fun with stats: 21% of the traffic was about banning fedora-usermgr. It is really beaten to death and beyond. Please check the archives if you weren't subscribed back then. > In lieu of that, if you are wanting a vote, then it should be you. If I were really a proxy introducing a 3rd party's vote proposal that the 3rd party couldn't/wouldn't represent itself I would agree, but the situation is that there *was* already a loadful of discussion initiated by that person and discussed with that person, only that we didn't have someone to do the actual decision. Now that we finally have a decisive EPEL it needs to finish the open issues, not rehash them for the umpteenth time. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp3eKIVhxpaE.pgp
Description: PGP signature