On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:49:26PM -0600, Bernard Johnson wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > Anyway the need to vote on that is undisputed, alone the magnitude of > > list space these topics consume require an official EPEL stand-up. And > > if you feel like there should be more information in the wiki or > > elsewhere, since you read all mails, maybe you could volunteer to do > > "that small task" and make Thorsten happy. > > > > FWIW "I don't want to be that guy". > > > > I'm not trying to push you into being something that you don't want. > You just seem to be the biggest proponent if the idea, today. > > If it's put up for a vote and not well represented, it will be a > disservice to those who do want it to happen. > > And if needed, I can do "that small task", however, it will be as an > opponent to repotag, so we would still need a proponent. Frankly, I > don't see a big benefit, so I'm not the best person to write it :) Gosh, contrary to my vanishing sanity I succumb, and I fed the votings with some notes, I even did some research with my FPC hat on on what the best implementation would be and added that as a note, too. Which since it was just *my* FPC hat is just a suggestion about how the FPC may attack this, it is neither part of the EPEL voting, nor a guarantee that the FPC will do so. There may be even smarter and better implementations. Happy Easter. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpbgpuXDbnWb.pgp
Description: PGP signature