Voting: repotag for EPEL

Thorsten Leemhuis fedora at leemhuis.info
Fri Apr 6 10:09:28 UTC 2007


Axel Thimm schrieb:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 11:25:46AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Axel Thimm schrieb:
>>> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:49:26PM -0600, Bernard Johnson wrote:
>>>> Axel Thimm wrote:
>>> Gosh, contrary to my vanishing sanity I succumb, and I fed the votings
>>> with some notes, I even did some research with my FPC hat on on what
>>> the best implementation would be and added that as a note, too. Which
>>> since it was just *my* FPC hat is just a suggestion about how the FPC
>>> may attack this, it is neither part of the EPEL voting, nor a
>>> guarantee that the FPC will do so. There may be even smarter and
>>> better implementations.
>> The critique I issued multiple times somewhere else in this thread still
>> is the same: I don't want to give a binding vote on a "Should EPEL carry
>> a repotag? If yes, the technical details will be delegated to the
>> Packaging Committee." question at this point of time. I want to see what
>> burden a repotag might create for packagers before I'll feel safe to
>> bless repotags. So I would vote "no" to currently; but I would vote
>> "yes" to a question "Should we further investigate the use of a repotag
>> and the technical details how to realize them", as long as someone is
>> willing to do the investigating work.
> 
> Since you already brought that up and I already answered to that, and
> now it's a rehash of the rehash, I'm just going to quote. [...]

Seems we are going in circles. Well, I was just trying to be helpful as
I thought you would be interested in that as that would be the chance to
get me to support your voting, but well, seems this is going nowhere.

CU
thl




More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list