Re: Voting: repotag for EPEL

[Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora leemhuis info>]

Axel Thimm schrieb:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 11:25:46AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Axel Thimm schrieb:
>>> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:49:26PM -0600, Bernard Johnson wrote:
>>>> Axel Thimm wrote:
>>> Gosh, contrary to my vanishing sanity I succumb, and I fed the votings
>>> with some notes, I even did some research with my FPC hat on on what
>>> the best implementation would be and added that as a note, too. Which
>>> since it was just *my* FPC hat is just a suggestion about how the FPC
>>> may attack this, it is neither part of the EPEL voting, nor a
>>> guarantee that the FPC will do so. There may be even smarter and
>>> better implementations.
>> The critique I issued multiple times somewhere else in this thread still
>> is the same: I don't want to give a binding vote on a "Should EPEL carry
>> a repotag? If yes, the technical details will be delegated to the
>> Packaging Committee." question at this point of time. I want to see what
>> burden a repotag might create for packagers before I'll feel safe to
>> bless repotags. So I would vote "no" to currently; but I would vote
>> "yes" to a question "Should we further investigate the use of a repotag
>> and the technical details how to realize them", as long as someone is
>> willing to do the investigating work.
> 
> Since you already brought that up and I already answered to that, and
> now it's a rehash of the rehash, I'm just going to quote. [...]

Seems we are going in circles. Well, I was just trying to be helpful as
I thought you would be interested in that as that would be the chance to
get me to support your voting, but well, seems this is going nowhere.

CU
thl