Relationship to existing 3rd party repos/CentOS/SL?

[Axel Thimm]

> What is EPEL's intended relation to the existing third party repos?
> 
>  * Will it jump in the game ignoring that 3rd party repos exist and
>    let Darwinism prevail?
>  * Will it try to work together with these repos? If yes, in what
>    concrete way?
>  * Does EPEL consider itself at the same level as these repos, or does
>    it place itself higher, pushing any compatibility issues to the
>    workload of these repos?
> 

On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:16:07PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Just some random thoughts from me here; I didn't want to reply on Axels
> statements directly as I feared that it tracks the discussion and my
> answers into a direction I don't want them.
> 
> My view on the whole thing:

The questions are simple to answer, why evade them?

> Please let's not make this a repowar; this discussion could easily start
> one (the repotag discussion was bad enough already). Thanks.

We need to clarify things and agendas, both internally and externally.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20070414/c44b8729/attachment.sig>