> What is EPEL's intended relation to the existing third party repos? > > * Will it jump in the game ignoring that 3rd party repos exist and > let Darwinism prevail? > * Will it try to work together with these repos? If yes, in what > concrete way? > * Does EPEL consider itself at the same level as these repos, or does > it place itself higher, pushing any compatibility issues to the > workload of these repos? > On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:16:07PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Just some random thoughts from me here; I didn't want to reply on Axels > statements directly as I feared that it tracks the discussion and my > answers into a direction I don't want them. > > My view on the whole thing: The questions are simple to answer, why evade them? > Please let's not make this a repowar; this discussion could easily start > one (the repotag discussion was bad enough already). Thanks. We need to clarify things and agendas, both internally and externally. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpiIUh17FwHX.pgp
Description: PGP signature