[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Relationship to existing 3rd party repos/CentOS/SL?
- From: Dag Wieers <dag wieers com>
- To: EPEL development disccusion <epel-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Relationship to existing 3rd party repos/CentOS/SL?
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:57:58 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> I understand people being pissed off (I am right now), but the right
> answer to repotags not being considered for epel is _not_ to drop them
> but to _keep_ them. In the hope (as with distro tags) that eventually
> the advantages will become obvious and they are adopted. Or not.
> Dropping them is ensuring that can not happen. Not a good choice if you
> indeed believe they are useful.
It is unfair that EPEL can get away with it because everybody else has
repotags. For that reason I am happy to be the repository without the
repotag !
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, dag wieers com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]