Re: el-4 confusion, misstatement on Wiki?

["Stephen John Smoogen" <smooge gmail com>]

On 7/31/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora leemhuis info> wrote:
>
>
> On 31.07.2007 22:19, Karsten Wade wrote:
> > Is this inaccurate/old?
> >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#head-8d21749b79a31472a018664cc02e7f248e53fe1e
>
> It's IMHO accurate, but they wording maybe could be improved.
>
> > If so, what do we want to say instead?
>
> "We are doing EPEL4 and if you look for a SRPM to take as base besides
> looking at the FC-3 branch please also take a look at those from
> http://centos.karan.org/, as those packages are known to work for EL4
> and tested there. "
>

What about 3 and 2 :)?

[As I have to take a bunch of 5 stuff and recompile it on 2 because
the 3rd party software runs on 2 but wants newer stuff... whee.]

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"