[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: To update or not to update...
- From: "Michael Stahnke" <mastahnke gmail com>
- To: "EPEL development disccusion" <epel-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: To update or not to update...
- Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 10:09:10 -0500
> But we could do it in two repos -- one stable EPEL repo and a "EPEL
> rolling" on top of it -- then users could individually select which
> software they want in newer versions.
If I want a rolling upstream, why am I using EL? You use a EL to
avoid quick releases and be on supported ABI compatible versions of
X,Y,Z for long periods of time. The notable exceptions are things
like a LAMP stack, but RH provides subscriptions and updates to that
more frequently on EL.
A rolling repo should just be a symlink to Fedora. That's why Fedora exists.
stahnma
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]