Re: Branching Asterisk for EPEL

["Jeffrey Ollie" <jeff ocjtech us>]

On 12/21/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora leemhuis info> wrote:
>
> k; the biggest problem with this scheme is: what if other packages want
> to use a similar tricks when they need a new gtk, qt, <insert other
> libs>. That could soon become a maintenance pita and a kind of second
> library layer ontop of (or in parallel) the libs from RHEL, which afaics
> nobody wants. Thus we might need to limit this and put some hurdles in
> the way; something like "such packages must be approved by the EPEL SIG
> in a meeting" or something like that.

Yeah, I don't really want to get into maintaining a copy of speex - I
think that I'll poke the RHEL speex maintainer and see if we can't
work something out.  If that doesn't work we'll have to wait for RHEL6
to branch Asterisk.

Jeff