Matthias Saou wrote:
FP! :-) Joke aside, I'd like to see which views we have on the release and update procedure to apply to EPEL. - Do we want a moving (and potentially breaking) set of packages which is constantly being updated? - Do we want a fixed set of packages when a RHEL release is made and focus on major bugfixes and security updates from there on?
While some folks certainly have an interest in the latter, I think it wiser to simply focus on the former, at least until we reach a critical mass of packages/maintainers. At that point, reconsideration would be reasonable.
-- Rex