Re: fftw advice...

[Rex Dieter <rdieter math unl edu>]

Patrice Dumas wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 01:47:45PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> 
>> OK, I'm going to forge ahead (following a suggestion from pjones):
>> keeping (main) Name: fftw ,so srpm matches cvs module, and make (binary)
>> packages named fftw3.  clear as mud?  hopefully, no one will yell.
> 
> This may be wrong, but what about a simple
> Provides: fftw3

It already contained that before (as well as an Obsoletes), but that (a
package rename fftw3 -> fftw) was unacceptable to rpmforge folks.

-- Rex