On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:15:38 -0400 "Konstantin Ryabitsev" <icon fedoraproject org> wrote: > The situation may be different for those who paid full enterprise > price for RHEL entitlements, but that doesn't change the fact that > unless EPEL provides "client" packages, I'll be left with broken > repositories. I will note, that it makes that much harder for me to > justify paying money to RH if I can have a better service using > Centos+EPEL. Yes I know, and this is the exact problem I yelled at our RHEL pm about months ago, as well as other EPEL heads at the time. I forewarned that this was a problem that needed to be solved, and nobody listened. I'll dig more on my side of things to find out the scoop of what all 5Server should have access to via RHN. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature