Re: Log from this weeks EPEL-SIG meeting (20070711)

[Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora leemhuis info>]

On 17.07.2007 21:05, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
>> 00:40:41 <    dgilmore> | i noticed that dag made some derogatory comments about epel on the centos mailing list
>> 00:40:51 <       quaid> | oh, good
>> 00:40:58 <       quaid> | nothing quite like keeping the flames warm
>> 00:41:01 <    dgilmore> | saying that we dont want to work with him
>> 00:41:12 <       quaid> | in fact
> -snip-
>> 00:42:05 <       quaid> | it's hard because these guys all had good points
>> 00:42:15 <       quaid> | but they put way too much heat into it
>> 00:42:29 <       quaid> | and burned the bridge before it could be built
>> 00:42:45 <       quaid> | anyway, water under the ... oh, wait, nevermind
>> 00:42:49 <       knurd> | we maybe should some carefully choose words into the wiki
>> 00:42:55 <       knurd> | why we didn#t go for repotags
> -snip-
> 
> My statements are *NOT* about repotags.

And my statements were not about your statements -- they just triggered
a "we should document the reasons why we do some things (like for
example no repotags) the way we do them" for me.

That's all.

> [...]

CU
knurd