[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: EPEL report week 29 2007
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora leemhuis info>
- To: EPEL development disccusion <epel-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: EPEL report week 29 2007
- Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:48:18 +0200
On 22.07.2007 15:04, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> === EPEL 5 ===
>>
>> Number of source packages: 469
>> Number of binary packages: 853
> The count here is different from the number of indexed packages at
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/i386/repoview/index.html.
> Why is that?
Afaics this is the reason:
repoview (icon, please correct me if I'm wrong) counts all packages in
the repo which sometimes includes old versions -- E.g. the wine package
for example is counted twice, because 0.9.39-1.el5 and 0.9.41-1.el5 are
in the repo. See
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/x86_64/repoview/wine.html
My script uses repoquery and counts only the latest version of a package
(e.g. I don't use "--show-dupes").
Both approaches IMHO make sense for their purpose. Sure, I could use
"--show-dupes" as well, but the number would be a bit misleading IMHO.
> Also shouldn't this report also include a section on EPEL 4?
Hmmm, it's part of it afaics.
Cu
thl
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]