Re: There are still dependencies for python-imaging el5

[Joel Andres Granados <jgranado redhat com>]

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 24.07.2007 11:14, Joel Andres Granados wrote:
>   
> > Received two automated email (attached) stating that plone depends on 
> > python-imaging for el5.
> > python-imaging for el5 terminated from EPEL due to its existence in both 
> > RHEL5 Client and Server.
> > Additionally the mail states that the broken dependency is only valid 
> > for ppc, as I don't see the other arch listed.
> >     
>
> Reason for that afaics: there is no PPC-EL5Client, thus the package from
> it could not be added to the server, thus python-imaging is still
> missing on PPC.
>   

strange :-/

>   
> > Does the plone spec in EPEL have to change?
> > Does the python-imaging in RHEL5 need modifying of some sort?
> > Does python-imaging in EPEL/el4 need modifying (some tag I don't know of)?
> > Or is there some black voodoo magic that is done to fix this?
> >     
>
> The proper workaround would be to excludearch ppc for plone and other
> packages that require python-imaging.
>
> The proper solution would be to ship python-imaging in EL5Server for PPC
> *or* ship it in EPEL5-PPC only. Going for the latter route might be a
> best short term fix. Just make EVR lower then the EL5 package, in case
> EL5Server starts shipping python-imaging sooner or later.
>
> Does that sound like a plan?
>   

Ok, Ill speak with Dan Riek and see what we can do on the RHEL side.   
Additionally I will build a new
python-imaging on the el5 branch with the 1.1.5 version and a release 
that is lower than the one in RHEL
that is only for ppc arch.
In this way the situation is fixed immediately and if python-imaging is 
added to RHELppc in the near future
I will dead the package again.

Regards


> CU
> kurd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>   


--
Joel Andres Granados