On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 17:09 -0500, Michael Stahnke wrote: > > > Somewhere I think we want to touch on the quality of the packages from > Fedora. I think that is a big selling point. Granted, not all > packages are perfect, but as a RHEL subscriber, my company thinks > highly of RHEL and how it is built, and thus like the way Fedora (at > least the former Core) was built. Somehow, that should be captured > int eh announment, methinks. > > I am also hesitant to use the Perl message because LOTS of perl stuff > still isn't in EPEL. (/me rebuilt several modules last week for > RHEL). Good points; I'll replace the Perl stuff with stuff about package quality, Fedora => RHEL, etc. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part