On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 09:00:02PM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > - I've also used atrpms a couple of times and it also played nice. > Centos recommends being cautious when using it and since it ships newer > versions of Base stuff I think it is normal to be cautious in this case. > But I am grateful that Axel saved my time suppling openswan and acl > enabled kernels, newer versions of lm-sensors (for chipsets not > supported by the standard kernel stack) or wifi support for my laptop > which runs Centos 3 (and cannot run anything newer due to the EDA tools > which are not supported on a newer OS) Thanks Manuel! ATrpms gets hit that often and that hard for offering replacement packages that a kind word in retaliation justifies the effort spent on doing so. ;) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpzxsrnBOXCu.pgp
Description: PGP signature