On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 13:21 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Karsten Wade wrote: > > > > So, similarly, EPEL could: > ... > > * Agree not to package something that is already in another repo, > > instead referring to that repo and package in particular (cf. > > fedoraforum.org and pointing at not-illegal solutions there) > > Currently not possible/practical in many cases, since by policy, epel > packages current can't (Build)Requires anything outside of epel. Aren't there a sub-set of packages that are either: * Likely to have multiple versions in use (stable => edge), or * Stand-alone ? - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part