Log from todays meeting

Karsten Wade kwade at redhat.com
Tue Jun 19 02:35:33 UTC 2007


On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 13:21 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Karsten Wade wrote:
> 
> 
> > So, similarly, EPEL could:
> ...
> > * Agree not to package something that is already in another repo,
> > instead referring to that repo and package in particular (cf.
> > fedoraforum.org and pointing at not-illegal solutions there)
> 
> Currently not possible/practical in many cases, since by policy, epel
> packages current can't (Build)Requires anything outside of epel.

Aren't there a sub-set of packages that are either:

* Likely to have multiple versions in use (stable  => edge), or
* Stand-alone

?

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20070618/7a319cff/attachment.sig>


More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list