On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 06:44:50PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Bill Nottingham schrieb: > > Thorsten Leemhuis (fedora leemhuis info) said: > >> AFIACS the same as in Extras in the past: File a bug, poke Red Hat > >> maintainers (¹) and pray that it gets fixed. > >> Especially the last part is important. > >> Sorry, sound like a joke, and in parts is one, but well, on the other > >> hands that's how it roughly worked for community contributors in Extras(²). > > Sure, but it's actually a lot easier to get things fixed in Fedora, > > >From my point of view it seems quite hard sometimes... But that's a > different story... > > > especially if it's just 'grab a newer version'. I'm not sure I can > > convincingly come up with a business case for rebasing guile for > > RHEL 4. :) > > :-) > > Anyway, do you have any proposed solution for the problem at hand that > not involves replacing or disturbing pacakges from RHEL? Then I'm all > ears... I don't know, maybe it shows that the all-frightened "don't replace" sign paved everywhere isn't the holy grail afterall. When even one section in Red Hat replaces packages from RHEL for LAMP ... -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpcOg3rJNXCj.pgp
Description: PGP signature